We rushed just as much in the last game without him as the first game with him, and our average rushes per game is basically equal.

CSP is still using the same game plan.

You guys are just so blinded by Ingram hate that you aren't looking at anything objectively.

ETA: Just so you can see the numbers.

Rush Pass
29 35
20 46
24 46
24 39
28 35

You can't look at those numbers and say Ingram's availability has influenced the play calling. There is no correlation for that.

This post was edited on 10/9/13 at 4:20 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by goatmilker

Castle Anthrax

Member since Feb 2009

64685 posts

Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:25 pm to LNCHBOX

quote:
You can't look at those numbers and say Ingram's availability has influenced the play calling

We are running using the screen pass. MI has never been apart of that.
Addition through subtraction.
I will trust CSP judgement on MI's skill at the screen game.
With Sproles and PT in at the same time as I'm sure you know they can both run or catch out of that formation. Worked very well against the bears.

Anyone here will tell you I battled chad and others over MI for two plus years.
My eyes finally sided with those who said he just doesn't fit here.
call it hate if you wish i just got tired of defending the pic.

This post was edited on 10/9/13 at 4:27 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Suntiger

BR or somewhere else

Member since Feb 2007

33031 posts

Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:26 pm to LNCHBOX

quote:
You guys are just so blinded by Ingram hate that you aren't looking at anything objectively.

I don't hate Ingram.

I also don't think he's played well at all for us.

I think we have done better the last three weeks on offense than we did the first two weeks.

I'm not going to say that the reason we've done better is because Ingram's been hurt.

I'm just saying we are playing better.

2 ...

Report Post

Saints Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board