Started By
Message

re: The Myth of Tony Romo

Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:28 pm to
Posted by F machine
Member since Jun 2009
11886 posts
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

I was just under the impression that for one to choke, it would mean he fell completely short of winning it all


No, just means he doesn't perform in high pressure situations.

quote:

Oh but no superbowls. Not on Brees level.


You seriously think he is on Brees' level? If you had to choose between the 2, you'd pick Romo? Come on, man. Like I said, I don't hate Romo but he certainly isn't on the Rodgers, Brees, Manning, Brady level.

You certainly are an angry man.
Posted by Michael J Cocks
Right Here
Member since Jun 2007
47155 posts
Posted on 10/9/13 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

No, just means he doesn't perform in high pressure situations.


No he's performed very well in high pressure situations he's had 19 game winning drives. Another 4-5 where we missed a FG that would have won. So, I'm not sure what you're saying. I guarantee you every QB in the league that you call Elite has shite the bed more than once in pressure situations. Peyton Manning used to be the choker, remember that?

quote:

You seriously think he is on Brees' level? If you had to choose between the 2, you'd pick Romo? Come on, man. Like I said, I don't hate Romo but he certainly isn't on the Rodgers, Brees, Manning, Brady level.


I don't think the difference is as much as you want to believe. He's outplaying 2 of the 4 you mentioned right now.

quote:

You certainly are an angry man.


how does making a valid argument make me angry? Am I just supposed to submit and agree? Or else I'm "angry?"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram