re: Anyone have a take on the Stanford vs. Washington ending?

Personally I think it was bullshite overturn, ruled catch on the field they showed every single angle and the bottom line was there was no evidence to overturn it. Even the announcers were saying there was nothing to overturn it. I know people don't like to think of conspiracy theories but that conspiracy all over it. No way Washington makes it to the BCS NC game, but the winner of the Oregon/Stanford game has a damn good shot but not if Stanford has a loss. To me that was so controversial on top of the fact that he took forever for the ruling, just proves the point. It has to be conclusive evidence to overturn the call on the field "which was ruled a catch" if it is overturn-able it should have not taken 3 minutes to figure it out. I wonder if any phone calls were made during that 3 minutes. There is just so much money in the BCS NC game and BCS's games in general that making sure you have at least one team involved in the mix it is minimum $5mil to the conference and if it is in the BCS-NC it is almost $20mil, that induces a hell of a lot of cheating.

Also the Ohio St. game was controversial to keep Ohio States chances alive. Northwestern made that first down it was clear a can be and they didn't give it to him, what a crock of shite. Again what are the chances of Ohio St. making it with one loss. They are just about guaranteed if they go undefeated.