- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A thought concerning the defensive scheme...
Posted on 9/29/13 at 11:00 pm to NWLATigerFan12
Posted on 9/29/13 at 11:00 pm to NWLATigerFan12
Blitz baby, blitz. Kill it before it gets started.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 11:11 pm to CalTiger53
If you go 0 or 1, man coverage, you are under the assumption that your guys are better than their guys. If a spread offense sees you in man, motions and stacked formations and bunch formations come into play. This is even more complicated for the secondary because assignments change based on formations, positioning of the WR's and routes run by the WR's. What if the offense goes empty backfield and you have your Mike LB on JFF? That's tough sledding for anybody. Please recall the Bama game winning screen...that was man coverage...
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)