- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kawasaki Mule reviews...
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:55 am to greasemonkey
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:55 am to greasemonkey
quote:
IMPO(profesional) I would buy the 400 or 500 ranger.
Grease, Ive had my mind set on that midsize 500 ranger since it came out. BUT, what do you think about that new 570, any difference for the extra change?
It will be a while before I buy, just getting ideas.
Posted on 9/18/13 at 1:00 pm to Polar Pop
quote:
Grease, Ive had my mind set on that midsize 500 ranger since it came out. BUT, what do you think about that new 570, any difference for the extra change?
all polaris engines over 335cc are some of the best.
Havent had any dealing with the 570 but the 900 and 1000 are made by the same company(prostar made in Merica) and we have abused the hell out of them with no prob.
OP
the mules are dependable if you dont have to go through any mud or water. If you do buy the Ranger.
The v twin mules have valve covers that warp and leak.Water pump will go out without warning and cost you a grand to fix engine(you can run a ranger without water without warping block and heads) Valves need adjusted to often(ranger never needs adj),they dont idle good. The rear diff lock will break if you use it often. They are cold natured(all kawis are unless fuel inj) and the rangers resale is double that of a mule.
FWIW I am far from a brand whore but the ranger is twice the machine that the mule is
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News