the rant loves him simply because he is right. you have it backwards. The dude was nothing more than a serviceable college QB. He's an awful NFL QB. Probably one of the worst 4 starters in the league.

And him winning a NC has nothing to do with his skill compared to Russell. Anyone who thinks Flynn was a better college QB is just a fricking retard and probably a racist to boot.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by MusicMaster

Baton Rouge

Member since Jun 2012

1362 posts

Posted on 8/24/13 at 10:23 am to Elleshoe

quote:
Anyone who thinks Flynn was a better college QB is just a fricking retard and probably a racist to boot.

2006 JR = way better than 2007 Flynn.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Bmath

Member since Aug 2010

18687 posts

Posted on 8/24/13 at 11:08 am to Elleshoe

quote:
The dude was nothing more than a serviceable college QB. He's an awful NFL QB. Probably one of the worst 4 starters in the league.

Why do you hate Matt Flynn so much? Did he bang your girlfriend or something?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by AlwysATgr

Member since Apr 2008

16549 posts

Posted on 8/24/13 at 11:29 pm to Elleshoe

quote:
The dude was nothing more than a serviceable college QB.

This is one big load of fertilizer!

Let me put his CFB days in perspective. Our O never scored less than 27 pts in regulation with Flynn as starter. That's something that Tebow, Cam, McCarron, Bradford, Manziel, or JaMarcus (and I love me some JaMarcus) can lay claim to.

Our O basically toyed with a who's who of DC's that year as well (Bud Foster, Strong, Muschamp, Saban-Smart, tOSU guy).

Moreover, recall that in '07 we had a new OC, OL coach, WR coach, only 1 WR returning (Early who was hurt much of the year), LaFell who had a case of the drops, and a makeshift right side of the OL (Hitt and Carnell).

How can you explain how prolific our O was in '07 without giving due credit to Flynn is less than sober.

1 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board