- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tuscaloosa Marine Shale oil well sets record (for TMS) - 1540
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:24 pm to FelicianaTigerfan
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:24 pm to FelicianaTigerfan
quote:
Total Prod bbls Time (Days)
BOE 1H 50,861 (856)
Joe Jackson 4-13H 39,001 (2120)
Horseshoe Hill 10H 101,042 (666)
Anderson 17 H #1 135,217 (583)
Anderson 18H #1 158,934 (574)
Ash 31H #1 13,238 (285)
Ash 31H #2 57,678 (281)
Joe Jackson 4H-2 34,137 (437)
Anderson 17H #2 73,502 (194)
Anderson 17H #3 42,057 (184)
Crosby 12-1H #1 138,545 (332)
Smith 5-29H #1 72,008 (190)
CMR-Foster Creek 20-7H 29,487 (117)
Huff 18/7H #1 6,635 (34)
These are the results of the MS Wells from Goodrich and Encana through January of this year. From the MSOGB files. Obviously some great disparity and as mentioned all things revolve around cost.
From what I read and understand, and I could very well be understanding incorrectly, some of the better wells in the TMS have a decline curve a little better than the Bakken wells and better than the average EFS well. It is obvious that there are more losers thus far than winners, but what does the future hold? Somebody is gambling on it.
Maybe those on this board that work and understand the patch can help us neophytes understand this a little better. Some of the wells have had problems causing shorter laterals and such.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:34 pm to RGV AG
quote:
From what I read and understand, and I could very well be understanding incorrectly, some of the better wells in the TMS have a decline curve a little better than the Bakken wells and better than the average EFS well
Ive read this also and if they can get issues worked out and cost of wells down I dont see why this play cant be a commercial one. Maybe not to the degree of the Bakken but maybe close
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:36 pm to RGV AG
quote:
some of the better wells in the TMS have a decline curve a little better than the Bakken wells and better than the average EFS well
Maybe a steeper decline but much, much higher IPs in the Bakken. The Crosby 12-1H would just be another well in Bakken country.
ETA- to put it in to perspective, one of the early Bakken discovery wells flowed naturally for +6 years and cum'd over 1,200,000 bbls during that time
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 4:46 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)