Started By
Message

re: Blue vs Hill

Posted on 7/10/13 at 11:47 am to
Posted by harry coleman beast
Left Field
Member since Aug 2008
52210 posts
Posted on 7/10/13 at 11:47 am to
The coaches went into last season thinking Blue was better, not that that matters or anything.
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
93801 posts
Posted on 7/10/13 at 11:52 am to
quote:

The coaches went into last season thinking Blue was better,


I don't have a problem with that whatsoever.
Posted by KaufmanATiger
The 'Boro
Member since Aug 2009
382 posts
Posted on 7/10/13 at 1:22 pm to
Hill...8.5
Blue...7.75

Hill's size, explosiveness, and speed give him the edge from the games I've seen.

Very glad to have hem both.

Posted by TigerTreyjpg
Monroe, LA
Member since Jun 2008
5815 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 8:33 am to
quote:

The coaches went into last season thinking Blue was better, not that that matters or anything


This is the point that I keep thinking about. From just the "eye" test, I'd say Hill looked better. But that being said, there's a reason the coaching staff had blue listed as the starter.

I never thought Ridley was that great of a back. Until about the bagillionth game in a row where he quietly got his 22 carries for about 125, never fumbled, made the right blocks, etc.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram