- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Max Scherzer
Posted on 7/8/13 at 2:25 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
Posted on 7/8/13 at 2:25 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
My point wasn’t that Trout should have won (although I do think he should have), it was that if nerds really made up the majority of voters, he would have. Because every single baseball “nerd” I read last year was on team Trout.
1
Posted on 7/8/13 at 2:36 pm to The Seaward
I think the gap was overstated. A lot of his case with numbers dealt with defensive metrics, which I find a little hard to trust. I also don't like WAR when you are comparing totally different players. They have different roles.
I would have voted for Miggy because I thought he had a better year at the plate (better OPS and shite), but the case for Trout was also easy to make. Miggy playing more games made a big difference for me. I have loved watching Miggy for a long time as well, so I was biased.
I would have voted for Miggy because I thought he had a better year at the plate (better OPS and shite), but the case for Trout was also easy to make. Miggy playing more games made a big difference for me. I have loved watching Miggy for a long time as well, so I was biased.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News