- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/24/13 at 4:56 pm to GatorsGators
quote:
So they're about the same on hardcourt and grass, while Nadal completely dominates Federer on clay. Does that not mean that Nadal has been better overall?
The point several people were making is that Nadal lost a lot of hard court (and grass) tourneys before he even got to play Fed, so the stats are misleading.
We all know the Grand Slam count (17 to 12). I'll also point out that Fed has won 77 titles overall compared to Nadal's 57. I believe Nadal's overall winning percentage is a touch higher though (.835 to .815).
This is a debate that will probably never be settled, but at the very least it won't be until both men have retired.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)