- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who was the better Coach, Dinardo vs. Archer, my first post
Posted on 6/22/13 at 1:20 pm to H-Town Tiger
Posted on 6/22/13 at 1:20 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Where you could debate is who was worse out of Archer and Hallman, but DiNardo was much, much better than either.
this. if he could have picked asst.s he would have had a long career at lsu.
1
Posted on 6/22/13 at 1:28 pm to LSU GrandDad
What makes hallmans recruiting more impressive is that he signed those guys while going 5-6, 2-9 out of the gate and they were just as bad before he got here. Dinardo went 9-3 and 10-2 in his first 2 years. That had to have helped recruiting those early saban teams.
No doubt Dinardo was a better coach ( I still like him a lot) I'm just trying to give hallman credit for possibly the only thing he did do well. He left enough talent on the team that Dinardo could win quickly. Dinardo did the same for saban but that is more than you can say for archer.
No doubt Dinardo was a better coach ( I still like him a lot) I'm just trying to give hallman credit for possibly the only thing he did do well. He left enough talent on the team that Dinardo could win quickly. Dinardo did the same for saban but that is more than you can say for archer.
This post was edited on 6/22/13 at 1:34 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News