Started By
Message

re: NBA has voted "NO" to Relocation of Sacramento Kings

Posted on 4/29/13 at 4:08 pm to
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12316 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 4:08 pm to
The Seattle owners already owned all of the land needed, had a binding agreement in place, a non-refundable down payment, a brand new arena ready to be built, and Stern worked behind the scenes for the Kings to shut it down.
Posted by Augustus
North Carolina
Member since Sep 2006
8290 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 4:08 pm to
Adrian Wojnarowski ?@WojYahooNBA
Combined relocation and finance committees will pass on recommendation to overall ownership body and they will honor vote. The Kings stay.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 4:16 pm to
I don't understand why they would vote no on this
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34532 posts
Posted on 4/30/13 at 10:15 am to
quote:

The Seattle owners already owned all of the land needed, had a binding agreement in place, a non-refundable down payment, a brand new arena ready to be built,
Why wouldn't they do this for the Sonics?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram