- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chris Faulk's decision.
Posted on 4/27/13 at 3:25 pm to H-Town Tiger
Posted on 4/27/13 at 3:25 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Here's an example for you. The Browns took Ryan Miller G Colo in the 5th round with the 160th pick last year. He signed a 4 year deal for $2.278M with a $178000 Signing bonus (which is his to keep). The base salary escalates each year. If he plays out the full contract, he makes the full $2.278M, while considerable less than Rieff's contract, still nothing to sneeze at. And if Miller becomes a starter in the next 3 years, he could earn a lot more
Well the 5th round has come and gone. We are midway through the 6th. Do you have an example for a late 6th or 7th rounder.....or more likely a free agent?
Fwiw....ESPN rates 8 undrafted OTs higher than him. It looks like his name is not going to be called today. I hope I'm wrong. I hate it for the kid.
Edit: several OTs must have just come off the board. They currently have 3 OTs ranked higher than Faulk. There still is hope.
This post was edited on 4/27/13 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 4/27/13 at 4:02 pm to Billder
Maybe the Saints can grab him as a FA. Bad decision.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News