- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU Basketball All Star Team
Posted on 2/20/13 at 5:49 am to EPORE
Posted on 2/20/13 at 5:49 am to EPORE
quote:Nah, at 13 deep we could be pretty seriously outclassed. Teams like UCLA, UNC, probably Duke and Kentucky, etc., bring a lot more to the table at spots 4 or 5 through 13. But our first 3 or 4 (Pete, Shaq, CJ, maybe Petit) would be the best in the business. Probably good enough that we could put a starting 5 on the floor (with, say, Maclin) that could match up well with anyone else.
I would stack this team up against any other school's all stars in the country...
Problem with a full roster is that most truly elite historical programs may only have 1 or 2, or maybe even none, right up at the Maravich/Shaq/CJ level, but they've got buttloads of guys just a half step below that level. LSU, on the other hand, might have two or three guys a step or two off that level, and then a bunch of guys on the next tier down. But when you look at the Grant Hills, Michael Jordans (in college), Lew Alcinders, Bill Russells, Danny Ferrys, Anthony Davises, and on and on and on . . . we just don't have that kind of depth.
But man, I'd love watching that starting 5. With Pete and CJ dishing and draining, Shaq dominating the inside, and Petit and Macklin just cleaning up the rest . . . damn, that would be something.
I'd say UCLA probably would have the next best all-time starting 5.
Posted on 2/20/13 at 8:09 am to King Joey
quote:
Nah, at 13 deep we could be pretty seriously outclassed.
I tend to agree. The starters would be incredible, but the bench is lackluster when you are considering all-time rosters.
Nobody questions the starting 5 of:
CJ
Pistol
Rudy
Pettit
Shaq
The real debate here is over the backups. I think the only clear cut backups are at PG and C. The rest you have decisions to make:
Ethan Martin
Howard Carter/Marcus Thornton/Ronnie Henderson?
John Williams/Redden/Vernel/Tasmin?
Bass/Stromile/Baby/Tyrus/Blanton?
Stanley Roberts
That would be a pretty lackluster set of backups when you compare them to the other great schools.
Posted on 2/20/13 at 9:43 am to King Joey
messed up the quote, but in response to a 13 man roster being our downfall-
Nah, our bench would be fine. Just try and weed out the depth chart at forward; we have a ton. Just the Brady years alone (which weren't the pinnacle), we have guys who could play with anyone.
Nah, our bench would be fine. Just try and weed out the depth chart at forward; we have a ton. Just the Brady years alone (which weren't the pinnacle), we have guys who could play with anyone.
This post was edited on 2/20/13 at 9:45 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News