Started By
Message

re: Wow, Emmert taking a beating as a stumbling, bumbling NCAA Pres

Posted on 2/19/13 at 1:38 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111719 posts
Posted on 2/19/13 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

But I still disagree that, in general, the NCAA paying someone to sit at the table is illegal. It may be sleazy, but they don't have the power to force people to participate: see, Reggie Bush case. And as pointed out by jacks, the first thing I would do as the school is point out that the info was tainted because the NCAA paid to obtain it.
If you were on trial for something, anything, how would you feel if you found out the witnesses testifying against you were being paid?

Do you think maybe you'd think they were just saying whatever they were told to say to get that money?

Hell, other way around, if you were on a jury, would you find testimony from someone paid to say something credible?
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15520 posts
Posted on 2/19/13 at 1:49 pm to
And as the school, you would try to discredit the info obtained. If it is just testimony, you can probably do a great job of discrediting it. But if the rat turns over hard evidence, then what?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram