- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Recent discussion of DAO hammerless ccw
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:11 am to Tbobby
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:11 am to Tbobby
quote:
The 442 has blued steel cylinder and barrel with aluminum frame. 642 has stainless cylinder and barrel and aluminum frame. Both are rated to shoot +P and neither have an exposed hammer so they won't snag on clothes. They both go for about $420 new and fit perfectly inside a cheap Uncle Mikes size 3 inside pocket holster.
Yeah, man, I got the difference - I was asking why you chose stainless over blued?
(Didn't the 442 used to come in a satin nickel finish, or did I dream that?)
1
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:28 am to Ace Midnight
The blued looks better to me, but I think the stainless is a more durable finish over the long run, especially if you use a leather holster. The 442 has always been blued to my knowledge.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News