- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Decorated combat veteran arrested in NY - charged with 5 felonies
Posted on 2/1/13 at 11:06 am to Vol Fan in the Bayou
Posted on 2/1/13 at 11:06 am to Vol Fan in the Bayou
So day 1 that the law is in effect what are citizens to do with their weapons and mags? how do they dispose (as if many will)of the illegal goods?
sell them... illegal
drive them out of town to a family/friend... illegal
drive them to the post office and mail them...illegal
carry them to the trash dump...illegal
transport them to a police station....illegal
Call the cops and tell them to come pick them up at your house where they are in your posession...illegal
So secretly disposing of them in the trash where common criminals can gain access to them seems like the only way to avoid felony charges.
also what is stoping me from making a citizens arrest for felony charges on police officers with guns having more than 7 round mags?
sell them... illegal
drive them out of town to a family/friend... illegal
drive them to the post office and mail them...illegal
carry them to the trash dump...illegal
transport them to a police station....illegal
Call the cops and tell them to come pick them up at your house where they are in your posession...illegal
So secretly disposing of them in the trash where common criminals can gain access to them seems like the only way to avoid felony charges.
also what is stoping me from making a citizens arrest for felony charges on police officers with guns having more than 7 round mags?
Posted on 2/1/13 at 12:05 pm to Bleeding purple
Don't get me wrong. Its a prick move and I understand what you are saying, but you are using shades of gray. Sounds very questionable as to whether or not it was illegal, but the cop thought he was in violation of the law and arrested him. Simple as that.
Again if it was illegal, he had time to get rid of them. The law wasn't passed and signed into law yesterday. Hell, we have been posting about it for a month on the OB. If he were in violation, he had more than ample time to get rid of them legally.
Its just like when I got a speeding ticket in a brand new speed zone. The prick cop got me for speeding about 3 days after the new zone was posted. I pleaded to the cop and to the judge about not knowing about it because driving that section of road for 10+ years. They both told me that I was in violation. OK, I was. Still a prick move though.
If he were in violation of the law, the cop was only doing his job and the guy was in violation of the law. He should have been arrested in accordance with the law. If he wants to be a test case - go for it. Thats how many things have changed in this country. Otherwise don't plead ignorance. It won't hold water.
Look there are plenty of laws I disagree with, but if I choose to violate one of them I am also choosing to pay my penalty in accordance with the law. That's why I choose to only violate speeding laws.
All I am saying is that we are a country of laws and rules. That is one of the things that seperates us from other countries. According to the cop, he broke the law. Simple as that. The Supreme Ct. will ultimately determine if the 2nd Amendment protects high capacity magazines.
Again if it was illegal, he had time to get rid of them. The law wasn't passed and signed into law yesterday. Hell, we have been posting about it for a month on the OB. If he were in violation, he had more than ample time to get rid of them legally.
Its just like when I got a speeding ticket in a brand new speed zone. The prick cop got me for speeding about 3 days after the new zone was posted. I pleaded to the cop and to the judge about not knowing about it because driving that section of road for 10+ years. They both told me that I was in violation. OK, I was. Still a prick move though.
If he were in violation of the law, the cop was only doing his job and the guy was in violation of the law. He should have been arrested in accordance with the law. If he wants to be a test case - go for it. Thats how many things have changed in this country. Otherwise don't plead ignorance. It won't hold water.
Look there are plenty of laws I disagree with, but if I choose to violate one of them I am also choosing to pay my penalty in accordance with the law. That's why I choose to only violate speeding laws.
All I am saying is that we are a country of laws and rules. That is one of the things that seperates us from other countries. According to the cop, he broke the law. Simple as that. The Supreme Ct. will ultimately determine if the 2nd Amendment protects high capacity magazines.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News