Started By
Message

re: LSU's success at recruiting Louisiana | States of Georgia and Ohio added

Posted on 1/17/13 at 4:53 pm to
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37638 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 4:53 pm to
I guess doing states and using their combined percentage wouldn't be a bad idea.

Clemson and South Carolina
Michigan and Michigan State
Oregon and Oregon State
Ole Miss and Miss State
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36181 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

I guess doing states and using their combined percentage wouldn't be a bad idea.

Clemson and South Carolina
Michigan and Michigan State
Oregon and Oregon State
Ole Miss and Miss State


I think USC/Clemson and Ole Miss/MSU are somewhat relevant

There's not enough grade A talent in Michigan and Oregon to really compare fairly to LSU's situation.

Florida/FSU
Texas/Texas A&M
Alabama/Auburn
MSU/Ole Miss
UGA/Ga Tech
USC/Clemson
Va Tech/Virginia

would be interesting since there's plenty of talent in those states (the top 15 is relevant)

Single States (talent rich states with only one major program) to compare directly to LSU are harder to find really

Louisiana - LSU
Ohio - tOSU

are fairly similar comparisons

Arkansas, Tennessee, Missouri, Minnesota, Connecticut etc are less relevant because even tho there is only one major college football program in the state there are not really the same numbers of outstanding college football prospects most years
This post was edited on 1/17/13 at 5:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram