- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ESPN Breaking that Lance Armstrong admits
Posted on 1/11/13 at 11:27 pm to DelU249
Posted on 1/11/13 at 11:27 pm to DelU249
quote:
Lie for a decade and only when everyone already knows, admit it.
And when are all the other cheaters that he rode against and beat going to admit that they were doing it too and still couldn't beat him ? No different than Clemens and Bonds. If everyone was doing it who had the real advantage ?
Posted on 1/12/13 at 9:05 am to OldTigahFot
quote:
And when are all the other cheaters that he rode against and beat going to admit that they were doing it too
they already have hoss.
Posted on 1/12/13 at 11:37 am to OldTigahFot
quote:
If everyone was doing it who had the real advantage ?
This point was brought up several times in this (and every Lance Armstrong) thread. The answer is that Lance had the advantage. There isn't just one pill that says steroids and everyone takes it. All of the evidence that has been presented suggests that Lance had the best 'doctors' and refused to let them work with other riders. So it isnt an equal playing field- nor was it equal in baseball.
With that said, I can't imagine having to make the choice about whether to take steroids or not, especially in cycling. If you want to be world class in cycling, taking stuff went with the territory- even more than in baseball. But that doesn't make everyone equal.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)