re: On the other hand if LSU had not gotten boned by the BCS

This "posi-tiger" view is beyond confounding.
The game was not close. How can anyone say that the better team lost?

If in fact, the better team won (which obviously it did by virtue of the arse-whipping it dished out), then how can you say that the better team shouldn't have even been in the game that, BTW, is supposed to pit the 2 best teams against each other?

This line of thinking is biased beyond belief.