- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fallacy: Miles philosophy of keeping games close
Posted on 1/6/13 at 10:06 pm to League Champs
Posted on 1/6/13 at 10:06 pm to League Champs
quote:LT was on your boy's 30% CR,
Playing close and winning in the 4th against Towson, La Tech, Troy, Washington, ASU, N. Car and Clemson; firstly doesnt always work, and secondly, makes you look weak.
Troy was come from behind, not clinging, Udub '09 was not a good LSU team,
UNC '10 was a D fail with O scoring 40+ pts into 4th,
Clemson was an execution failure, and if passes were on target and protect assigns picked up, would've been a blowout.
Games may end up close, but if you know a bit about FB, you know it wasn't planned this way.
1
Posted on 1/6/13 at 10:20 pm to Mayhawman
quote:
LT was on your boy's 30% CR, Troy was come from behind, not clinging, Udub '09 was not a good LSU team, UNC '10 was a D fail with O scoring 40+ pts into 4th, Clemson was an execution failure, and if passes were on target and protect assigns picked up, would've been a blowout. Games may end up close, but if you know a bit about FB, you know it wasn't planned this way.
Is that laundry list of reasons for losses and near losses individual events or is there a larger theme that might tie them together?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News