- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Screw Rotten Tomatoes overall %, what did the M/TV board think of The Hobbit
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:28 pm to iwyLSUiwy
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:28 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Yeah it was pretty much a given that he was going to have to do this which is fine with me seeing as there is some pretty cool stuff in there.
No, it was not a given. I don't fault Peter Jackson for doing 3 movies whether its because of Artistic vision or money but The Hobbitt could have been done in 2.
2
Posted on 12/27/12 at 6:46 pm to jacks40
I wanted to punch Galadriel when she was trying to see how slow she could walk around the table at that little meeting in Rivendell. 
quote:I concur.
No, it was not a given. I don't fault Peter Jackson for doing 3 movies whether its because of Artistic vision or money but The Hobbitt could have been done in 2.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:54 pm to jacks40
quote:
No, it was not a given. I don't fault Peter Jackson for doing 3 movies whether its because of Artistic vision or money but The Hobbitt could have been done in 2
I was just talking about having to use the appendices. It would have been virtually impossible not to use them even if it was two movies.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News