- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: England and WC 2014
Posted on 12/21/12 at 2:22 am to LSUSOBEAST1
Posted on 12/21/12 at 2:22 am to LSUSOBEAST1
I don't care about playing style. While struggling for Arsenal, Walcott has been a key contributor for England. We aren't talking about FUT here. Ribery is 10x him in value, regardless of dissimilarities in the way they play. But get off this clown France tangent and actually give real arguments about England's talent, because none have been made so far.
I like Wilshere and think he has great upside, but this talk of him being able to carry the team is dum. He's not a bad player at all. But this thread was built on the premise that England is supposed to be able to play with anyone in the world. The fact that Germany has several CAMs way better than supposedly England's biggest gamechanger should be a cause for concern.
I like Wilshere and think he has great upside, but this talk of him being able to carry the team is dum. He's not a bad player at all. But this thread was built on the premise that England is supposed to be able to play with anyone in the world. The fact that Germany has several CAMs way better than supposedly England's biggest gamechanger should be a cause for concern.
This post was edited on 12/21/12 at 2:31 am
Posted on 12/21/12 at 11:36 am to acgeaux129
quote:
I don't care about playing style.
I'm not sure what you want me to tell you then. What kind of answer are you looking for? If you are unaware of the impact of style of play in the international game then I have no answers for you.
Additionally, you are an Arsenal fan..am I right? It seems to me you know very little about your own players. You talk about the value comparison between RIbery and Walcott, yet you fail to acknowledge the outstanding season Walcott is having. He is every bit as important to his club as Ribery is to his (regardless of "value"). You also seem to be unaware of the role Wilshere will have in an English midfield.
Furthermore, I have already presented you with a pool of roughly 25 (mostly young) English players. The majority of those players are technically sound and like to play short passes on the turf, which is already a major step up from the previous generation. This will be key when competing in international tournaments. Not to mention they will have a world class keeper and striker, two supremely important qualities most top countries have.
Your original premise asked about "bright spots" and "optimism." Yet your argument has virtually centered around comparing them to Germany, which is both idiotic and unfair. You bring up losing Gerrard and Lampard, but if you are familiar with English history at all, you would know this is nothing but a good thing. Gerrard may still be around in 2014 and may be capable of playing the DLP role. He will have at least 2 seasons in Rodgers' system by then and that will help complete him as a player. It seems Rodgers is valuing Gerrard's longevity over immediate success by playing him in a deeper role. His game has already changed and that can only help England's chances.
You know it's a silly argument when I am defending an English national team.
This post was edited on 12/21/12 at 11:40 am
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News