- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Josh Hamilton agrees to terms with Angels 5 yrs/125 Mill
Posted on 12/14/12 at 4:38 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 12/14/12 at 4:38 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
His K rate has basically been the same every year besides this past season.
Exactly. So, as I said, if its a one year thing, no biggee. If this is a trend, then it's very bad. He nearly doubled his K rate in a season That's almost unheard of (unless the hitter started with a really low K rate).
Batting average tends to fluctuate for a hitter for a lot of reasons, so year, that 359 is an aberration, too. But a 300 BA becomes nearly unattainable if you're striking out in a third of your at bats. Do the math.
Let's say you strike out 150 times in 450 at bats (using for ease of math, but also, it's better to guess the under for Hamilton's at bats). That's 1/3 of your at bats just gone. So now to hit .300, you need 135 hits and you only have 300 at bats to do it in. That means Hamilton has to hit .450 in at bats he doesn't strike out in, which is really, really high. Home runs help, but after that, you need to be pretty hit lucky. He struck out in 29% of his at bats last year, which is about as high of a K rate as you can have and still have a shot at 300. Once you're above 30%, it becomes a war against math.
Posted on 12/14/12 at 4:53 pm to Baloo
I agree with that,
I am just saying a 70pt decrease in average over 2 years isn't because of Ks
He dropped 61 pts just over the next year from 2010 to 2011 and his k rate was basically the same. Once every 5.2 AB compared to about 5.4 in his huge MVP year.
It depends how you define trend. Meaning "r get worse" or stay the same.
Should it even stay the same, I'm not sure how it is very bad. He had a great year last year despite the K's.
Will he win another batting title? Probably not.
Could he K 150x and still hit 35 hr and drive in 120 runs? Sure
He's not going to fall off the face of the earth. Plenty of great run producers who strike out a lot in this league.
I am just saying a 70pt decrease in average over 2 years isn't because of Ks
He dropped 61 pts just over the next year from 2010 to 2011 and his k rate was basically the same. Once every 5.2 AB compared to about 5.4 in his huge MVP year.
quote:
If this is a trend, then it's very bad. He nearly doubled his K rate in a season That's almost unheard of (unless the hitter started with a really low K rate).
It depends how you define trend. Meaning "r get worse" or stay the same.
Should it even stay the same, I'm not sure how it is very bad. He had a great year last year despite the K's.
Will he win another batting title? Probably not.
Could he K 150x and still hit 35 hr and drive in 120 runs? Sure
He's not going to fall off the face of the earth. Plenty of great run producers who strike out a lot in this league.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News