Started By
Message

re: Laser Sights

Posted on 11/7/12 at 7:24 pm to
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61625 posts
Posted on 11/7/12 at 7:24 pm to
i've always hated glocks, the 26 is no different. i just don't like the ergonomics of them.

there are better striker fire guns out there IMO, the Smith and Wesson M&P being the one i'm most fond of out of the striker fire pistols
Posted by Geauxtiga
No man's land
Member since Jan 2008
34377 posts
Posted on 11/7/12 at 7:25 pm to
I don't know what "striker fire" means.
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11924 posts
Posted on 11/7/12 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

IMO, the Smith and Wesson M&P being the one i'm most fond of out of the striker fire pistols


Yep. And the grip can accommodate different shooters' hand sizes whereas with the Glock you're stuck with the shitty wide grip no matter what you do. The grip angle, sights, and serrations are better on the M&P as well.

Although it's a Glock and you may throw up, here is a cutaway of a striker-fired handgun.



The mechanism is considered "Double Action only" since the action does two things (double) - it retracts the firing pin (#1) and then releases it (#2).

Here is a hammer-fired gun.



The hammer is what strikes the firing pin, causing the firing pin to detonate the primer and work the action. The 1911 is "Single Action only" meaning pulling the trigger does one thing - releases the hammer.

Some hammer-fired guns are DAO and will both retract the hammer (#1) and release the hammer (#2). Some are also double action and single action, like a modern revolver. But the main difference between hammer and striker guns is that the striker is not visible, whereas the hammer is.
This post was edited on 11/7/12 at 9:01 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram