Started By
Message

re: Horrible WR routes on 2nd Mettenberger fumble

Posted on 9/25/12 at 1:00 pm to
Posted by Putty
Member since Oct 2003
25608 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Horrible WR routes on 2nd Mettenberger fumble



All I see is Dworaczyk getting beasted in a 5 on 3 scenario.
Posted by lsuexpert57
Back Brusly
Member since Oct 2008
1606 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

All I see is Dworaczyk getting beasted in a 5 on 3 scenario.


Thats because you see what you want to see. I spent about 3 paragraphs explaining this play yesterday but the pic, if taken in context shows it all.

At the point this pic was taken, JD had already cut Lemonier, forcing him to put both hands on the ground to regain his balance.

In the pic, Mett had ALREADY looked out to Landry and decided NOT to throw it even though it appears Landry is open for first down yardage. Mett has already pulled it down and is looking to scramble.

Yes JD could have made a SLIGHTLY better cut block but even if Lemonier had went completely to the ground he would likely have popped up and sacked Mett anyway.

The rantards have been blaming JD for this play since the game ended....but to my eyes the blame lies more with Mett and/or the recievers.

Posted by fjohns1
Member since Oct 2011
1333 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Horrible WR routes on 2nd Mettenberger fumble


dude landry is wide open and mett is looking the other way. It was a horrible chop block but if he is looking to the right and actually throws the ball then it would have been a first down. He still would have got laid out though. My only question is if we have 3 reciever's to the right why the hell is he looking left first??
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram