quote:
the fact that he still hasnt been cast and the avoidance of introducing too many new people. We've already seen they're doing away with bloody mummers and vargo hoat (using some guy with a lisp named "Locke" instead) and i think they will use someone already in the story. maybe even shireen?

That's disappointing that they're doing away with the Brave Companions. I see no reason to do so.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by BluegrassBelle

RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019

Member since Nov 2010

99930 posts

Posted on 3/17/13 at 11:32 am to OMLandshark

Your budget is a reason to. They don't want it to suffer the same fate as Rome, especially given they use the locations they do for the sets (and that ain't cheap either).

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Carson123987

Middle Court at the Rec

Member since Jul 2011

66523 posts

Posted on 3/17/13 at 11:34 am to OMLandshark

quote:
That's disappointing that they're doing away with the Brave Companions. I see no reason to do so.

im not too mad. think of it from a tv viewers view. you have the brotherhood without banners getting introduced, and the golden company down the road. with brave companions, that'd be 3 groups to keep track of and there are already enough people as it is

the guy playing Locke (Vargo) will still have a lisp, and his group will still cut Jaime's hand off, so book readers will understand the shoutout. I think they will make Locke's group under Roose so that they can introduce how fricked up the Boltons are this season with Reek and by cutting off Jaime's hand.

It would have to be before Roose and Tywin plan the RW, however. Or perhaps it could be Roose's men acting of their own accord.

2 ...

Report Post

Book Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board