Started By
Message

re: Arsenal 2012/2013 Season Long Thread

Posted on 3/2/13 at 5:12 pm to
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 3/2/13 at 5:12 pm to
I guess. It'd really only be bad for Liverpool and Tottenham. It'd entrench a top 4. Would increase the necessity for FFP or some kind of luxury tax system IMO.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 3/2/13 at 5:30 pm to
It would be detrimental to the entire league. How far away from a TV deal similar to La Liga's is the PL? Do you really think these foreign investors are going to want to maintain a deal that sees Aston Villa and Wigan get the same cut as them? Where does the line stop of foreign billionaires just picking a club, destroying the financial system in England? How soon before we have 15 clubs owned by billionaires?

Arsenal doesn't need this. They operate fine as is, and it's good for the game. They value the right things, and silverware really isn't everything, especially for the fans in England. They value tradition and culture - and the integrity of the game. There is no way they would be happy with this.
This post was edited on 3/2/13 at 5:31 pm
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
8186 posts
Posted on 3/2/13 at 5:32 pm to
Blame Chelsea and Man City and Man U and Barca and Real and PSG for blowing up the market like it is. I hate "financial doping" too but unfortunately thats really the only way to keep up with the Jones. Sucks for Liverpool and Tottenham, but shite even Liverpool spent pretty extravagantly their first year under new ownership
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160118 posts
Posted on 3/2/13 at 5:33 pm to
Wenger would just buy Africa
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram