Started By
Message

re: SEC Champ Rings

Posted on 6/16/12 at 6:21 pm to
Posted by obsessedgator
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2004
516 posts
Posted on 6/16/12 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

by allowing Bama to win the NC


They didn't. They put the second most deserving team in the national title game and they proved that they were clearly better than LSU.

Do you think losing to a 5-7 Iowa State team shouldn't count against Ok State? Their job is to get the two most deserving teams.
Posted by Thunder Tiger
Member since Sep 2011
2608 posts
Posted on 6/16/12 at 6:39 pm to
My original point was that only conference champs should go to the NC for the reasons I gave, and I stated this before the NC. IMO not being conference champs alone should've disqualified Bama.
quote:

They alone put the second most deserving team in the national title game and they proved that they were clearly better than LSU.

Just because Bama won doesn't mean they deserved to be given the chance to win. That's circular Gump logic.
quote:

Do you think losing to a 5-7 Iowa State team shouldn't count against Ok State?

Of course it should, and after considering everything, including this loss, the computers favored Okie. How can this be if Bama was so clearly the most deserving team? The human voters simply favored Bama, some voting Okie as low as 6th. Does that sound reasonable to you? Read this article if you think only LSU homers feel this way: LINK
This post was edited on 6/16/12 at 6:41 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram