Started By
Message

re: Lord of the Rings Trilogy: Disappointing

Posted on 4/21/12 at 1:08 am to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
114203 posts
Posted on 4/21/12 at 1:08 am to
quote:

1. Far too drawn-out only for the purposes of making more money by gullible movie-goers.



You are aware that these were based on a 1000 page epic right?This isn't like splitting a book into two films to get more money out of your audience, its a pre established trilogy. Also that makes no sense in how this is making more money out of "gullible movie-goers". This trilogy is probably the most ambitious film project since "Lawrence of Arabia", to where there was a huge risk in making these films. The films were over 3 hours long each, which are relatively rare since most people have short attention spans and don't want to sit in the theater that long, but also because that means you can't have as many showings of the same film. So your argument is retarded.

quote:

2. The entire plot is about a ring.

So fricking what? The first rule of making a good film is it's not WHAT the film is about, but HOW the film is about. It executed the HOW almost flawlessly. Plus really this is what the film is about:

The best explanation for why they simply didn't take the eagles is because the story isn't necessarily about the ring, even though it's the focal point of the books. The books were more about friendship and loyalty. Staying true to each other in spite of what they went through. What I always get from them when I watch them.


Good explanation sicboy.

quote:

3. The plot appears far too convoluted for the average man but is just the opposite.


Please go on and explain your stupidity.

quote:

4. The dramatic sequences (which are basically almost the entire movie) are slow beyond paint drying. I don't think that the Elven woman (Liv Tyler) or the queen? (Cate Blanchett) could've been slower if they had given them Halcion.

It's called character development. When you're doing an 11 hour epic, you have to develop your characters more slowly than you do in say an hour and a half film. If you want to see an action film with the complete lack of it and just mindnumbing action with characters you don't give a flying frick about, watch a Roland Emmerich film.

quote:

5. Peter Jackson must've instructed both Viggo and Elijah: "have the most dumbfounded look on your face throughout the movies as much as is humanly possible."

Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
78199 posts
Posted on 4/21/12 at 1:16 am to
Have you watched the behind the scenes stuff? There's a part when they were filming either the last scenes or the last one with Elijah Wood......the scene where Frodo is writing the Lord of the Rings and he's talking about his wound still hurting. They film it, and for the most part it's good. Jackson wants to do more takes. Nothing out of the ordinary, so they go on. He does it over and over and over again, and everyone is kind of looking at each other, wondering what was wrong with the previous take. But they all know that Jackson just doesn't want it to end. He was in love with those movies.

When they finally wrapped, him and Elijah hug for a long time. At that point, I started cutting onions.
This post was edited on 4/21/12 at 1:19 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram