re: Renderings of expansion from LSU

quote:

---

I'm not sure we're getting anywhere with this conversation with your contributions(?) providing such a huge distraction. I'll keep cursing, sexual references, and name calling out of my response as best I can.

It's clear you're cool with the design simply because it's better than what you could come up with. I'm not going to knock that. But what's also clear to me is that there's a gap between when you think works and what could really make the project a homerun. Certainly that's my opinion. And I've spoken very plainly that the stretching and warping of the original design makes it no longer pleasing to the eye.

I'm no architect; so, I can't put forth an actual design. (Maybe if LSU paid me a few thousand like they paid the architect to draw up the designs, I would be happy to put something together.) I can just say that I'm comfortable, as a donating alumnus who has taken an interest in campus history and architecture, raising concerns about the design's shortcomings.

---