Started By
Message

re: 70% of supermarket ground beef contains "pink slime"

Posted on 3/8/12 at 12:57 pm to
Posted by simbo
Member since Jun 2011
1664 posts
Posted on 3/8/12 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Not saying it's impossible, just that it hasn't been proven enough to consider it when evaluating a patients cancer.


It has been proven. The largest cancer cause study ever showed a direct correlation between animal protein and all types of cancers and diseases.

You think the 1000% rise in cancer rates in the US the last 100 years is genetics or chance? It's our diet.

LINK

DR.'s all around the world support the studies and claims.



This post was edited on 3/8/12 at 12:58 pm
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43317 posts
Posted on 3/8/12 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

You think the 1000% rise in cancer rates in the US the last 100 years is genetics or chance? It's our diet.


In the last 100 years we've increased carbohydrate consumption more than anything else.
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
22782 posts
Posted on 3/8/12 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

You think the 1000% rise in cancer rates in the US the last 100 years is genetics or chance? It's our diet.


So what do you attribute the decrease in rates of the big 6 (brain, lung, colon, breast, gyn, pancreas) over the last decade?


oral cancer (secondary to HPV) and thyroid cancer (secondary to environmental exposures) are the anomolies. They are still increasing.
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
22782 posts
Posted on 3/8/12 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

DR.'s all around the world support the studies and claims


Then why can't I find PI's all over the world with similar published studies? Just the book you linked.

I found this...

quote:

Processed meat intake may be involved in the etiology of colorectal cancer, a major cause of death in affluent countries. The epidemiologic studies published to date conclude that the excess risk in the highest category of processed meat-eaters is comprised between 20% and 50% compared with non-eaters. In addition, the excess risk per gram of intake is clearly higher than that of fresh red meat. Several hypotheses, which are mainly based on studies carried out on red meat, may explain why processed meat intake is linked to cancer risk


And this...

quote:

However, the risk of developing CRC is well recognised to be associated not only with diet but also with obesity and lack of exercise. While epidemiological evidence shows an association with factors such as high red meat intake and low intake of vegetables, fibre and fish,


And this...

quote:

Consumption of traditional soups, meat, salted and dried fish, cold cuts and seasoned cheeses, as well as the intake of animal proteins and nitrites were related to an increased GC risk. On the contrary consumption of fresh fruit, citrus fruit, raw vegetables, spices, garlic and olive oil, and vitamin C, E and beta-carotene intake were found to be protective factors.


In other words, most published data indicates an increased risk of cancer from the overall diet, not just meat ingestion. High levels of meat ingestion, combined with preventative factors like fish, vegs, fruit, doesn't equal an increased cancer risk.
This post was edited on 3/8/12 at 1:10 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram