- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let's be honest here, do some of yall "dislike" Jerrard Randall because he's
Posted on 3/3/12 at 3:57 pm to Starchild
Posted on 3/3/12 at 3:57 pm to Starchild
quote:
I also don't like this whole "added dimension" of the offense crap that everyone likes to spew about mobile QBs. The fact of the matter is pocket passers are better as a whole and there is no getting around it. We do not NEED to have a QB who can run a 4.5 40. It's a different game but Brees, Brady, and Manning seem to do fine without that ability and I would take one of them any day of the week over a "mobile" QB.
There's also the issue of beating around the bush of playing the race card. Let's face it...most mobile QBs that really rely on their running are black. Even guys like Vick or McNabb who've had lots of success just can't hold a candle to a true pocket passer. Now guys like Cam Newton or Tim Tebow may change that view a bit, but I think ultimately pocket passer is the way to go in football.
You are confusing college and pro. Id take (in college) Newton Tebow Vick RGIII and Young over Luck Leinart and Jimmy Clausen and their individual and respective teams successes would seem to indicate that to be true.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)