Started By
Message

re: Just saw this and almost vomited. sorry if germans

Posted on 2/16/12 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by TexasTiger1185
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
13074 posts
Posted on 2/16/12 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Correction -

* We won the conference championship.
* Georgia finsihed second in the conference.
* Ala. finished second place in their DIVISION.
* They won the Saban-lobbied for on TV, ESPN-
approved, BCS-voter-biased, bald-faced lie to
Okie State, National Championship. They are officially the laughing-stock of national champions, the poster-boys of unabashed begging, the Sanduskies of bias.



Let me ask you this, if we had won that game would you think we were National Champions?

The game still would have been saban lobbied
it would still have been ESPN-approved,
still BCS-voter-biased, still a bald-faced lie to okie state

None of those things would have changed even a little bit.
Posted by MetryTyger
Metro NOLA, LA
Member since Jan 2004
15608 posts
Posted on 2/16/12 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

TexasTiger1185
Just saw this and almost vomited. sorry if germans
quote:
Correction -

* We won the conference championship.
* Georgia finsihed second in the conference.
* Ala. finished second place in their DIVISION.
* They won the Saban-lobbied for on TV, ESPN-
approved, BCS-voter-biased, bald-faced lie to
Okie State, National Championship. They are officially the laughing-stock of national champions, the poster-boys of unabashed begging, the Sanduskies of bias.



Let me ask you this, if we had won that game would you think we were National Champions?

The game still would have been saban lobbied
it would still have been ESPN-approved,
still BCS-voter-biased, still a bald-faced lie to okie state

None of those things would have changed even a little bit.



Yes. Correct. But, it would also have induced much more of the 'Bama did not deserve a rematch' talk. The BCS would have been over-whelmingly second-guessed.
The thing is, I still don't think they deserved the rematch, simply because of all the media 'talk' that Okla State, should they accomplish all the necessary criteria, would have had a strong case for #2.
Well, not only did they do everything they were supposed to, and also had a much stronger SOS, as well as winning their conference, but it turned out that the voting was """"""""""NOT"""""""""" close like all the media implored us to believe would be.
Thanks to a handful of monumentally selfish coachs and BCS human poll voters - who voted Okla State NUMBER SIX, Alabama was in the game when they clearly should not have been.

BTW, why even """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""PLAY"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
conference championship games ??????????????????

They clearly have no phucking relevance or purpose at all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram