Started By
Message

re: national championships using bama logic

Posted on 2/4/12 at 12:55 am to
Posted by DvlsAdvocat
Your Mom's House, AL
Member since Jul 2007
24491 posts
Posted on 2/4/12 at 12:55 am to
quote:

If you want to look at firm, no-doubt-about-it NC's, bama has 6 (I think, maybe 5).


Absolutely retarded statement. Just because you don't like the AP/UPI methodology, the titles awarded under it are not less valid.
Posted by LSU Weirdo
Germantown
Member since Mar 2006
795 posts
Posted on 2/4/12 at 1:16 am to
quote:

DvlsAdvocat


quote:

Absolutely retarded statement. Just because you don't like the AP/UPI methodology, the titles awarded under it are not less valid.


Soooo... if bama ended the season #1 with split polls, then played the other poll's #1 in a bowl game... and LOST to that other #1 in the bowl game... you still feel comfortable flailing your arms around and screaming that bama was national champion for that year?

Seriously?

Let me ask you... what the fuk does "national champion" mean to you?

Obviously, to an updyke retard, "national champion" is a meaningless stat, a numeral for you treasure chest... rather than a proud and reasonable claim of "best team" or "best season".

You see, that's why everyone outside of Gump Realm thinks you guys are delusional. You're desperately inflating your numbers. Why do that? Bama has a great history without resorting to this desperate, delusional insanity.

I can understand why Ole Miss uses gump math... without it, they have nothing. Bama isn't Ole Miss. Why act like them?
This post was edited on 2/4/12 at 4:43 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram