Started By
Message

re: My 9 y/o daughter's conclusion after seeing the climax in League of Their Own

Posted on 12/25/11 at 1:04 am to
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 12/25/11 at 1:04 am to
quote:

quote:
Like I said, if it did not matter to her, then she'd have kept driving to Oregon.


i think the point is, is that when her sister was rounding the bases, she realized she needed to give her sister the break.


Logically this can't be right - for the various reasons I've posted earlier - and for the reason that the construct of the story predicts her dropping the ball. The quote mentions Oregon and her husband returning home...she almost left the game to return to her regular life - while Kit is still heavily invested in playing baseball.

The story arc demands that Dottie dropped the ball as the result of those two competing forces...her heart was no longer in the game. Kit raised her game while Dottie had one foot off the diamond...playing the game somewhat reluctantly. Tom Hanks preached all movie that baseball demanded that commitment...this wasn't just a diversion to take lightly. Kit raises her game and surpasses Dottie because Dottie has emotionally moved on. Dottie was the best player but she wasn't perfect...she was a competitor who excelled when her heart as in the game. Kit cared more...she grew up, beat her older sister finally (as the movie demands) and Dottie smiles with pride. There's no way she wants her sister struck out (by giving her pitcher the key to striking out Kit) demands the relay quickly (looking nervous they aren't going to be able to tag Kit out) and then suddenly change her mind once she gets hit...that yes, she wants her sister to hit the game winning hit. This reasoning is heartwarming but it's not how the movie was constructed. It's everyone else projecting their own feelings on it.
This post was edited on 12/25/11 at 1:08 am
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 12/25/11 at 1:11 am to
quote:

The story arc demands that Dottie dropped the ball as the result of those two competing forces...her heart was no longer in the game. Kit raised her game while Dottie had one foot off the diamond...playing the game somewhat reluctantly. Tom Hanks preached all movie that baseball demanded that commitment...this wasn't just a diversion to take lightly. Kit raises her game and surpasses Dottie because Dottie has emotionally moved on. Dottie was the best player but she wasn't perfect...she was a competitor who excelled when her heart as in the game. Kit cared more...she grew up, beat her older sister finally (as the movie demands) and Dottie smiles with pride. There's no way she wants her sister struck out (by giving her pitcher the key to striking out Kit) demands the relay quickly (looking nervous they aren't going to be able to tag Kit out) and then suddenly change her mind once she gets hit...that yes, she wants her sister to hit the game winning hit. This reasoning is heartwarming but it's not how the movie was constructed. It's everyone else projecting their own feelings on it.

This.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425883 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

her heart was no longer in the game.

exactly, so why not let her sister have the glory when it wouldn't affect her at all?

at that moment, she realized the game meant shite to her. she could let her sister have all the glory and it came at no cost to her

win-win

i have done this EXACT same thing before
This post was edited on 12/27/11 at 4:42 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram