Started By
Message

re: BCS "fix" question - the "+1"

Posted on 12/8/11 at 8:46 am to
Posted by TigerInAnnArbor
Ann Arbor, Mi
Member since May 2009
1490 posts
Posted on 12/8/11 at 8:46 am to
Whatever is adopted won't be perfect, but it'd be a lot better than it is now.

I like the idea of a 6 team playoff by BCS standings, but it days away from each BCS bowl in my opinion.
Posted by bayoubengal11
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2008
297 posts
Posted on 12/8/11 at 12:30 pm to
+1 would have it's flaws just like any other system. In the end, it all comes down to rankings. How you rank the teams. Solely using computers for whatever system (with an easy to understand formula [not some of the complicated crap now] much like power rankings in high school football) would add an unbiased, every team knows what they need to do, aspect, which is win games and play opponents that will win games.

quote:

I like the idea of a 6 team playoff by BCS standings, but it days away from each BCS bowl in my opinion.


As for this, I'm more for a 6 team as well, but only using the conference champions (regardless of record). Makes for a simple to understand rule. Win your conference and you're in, don't and you aren't.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram