Started By
Message

re: Who are the largest Winners and Losers In the New SEC?

Posted on 11/8/11 at 3:22 pm to
Posted by SunHog
Illinois
Member since Jan 2011
9202 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Come on SunHog, you act like Arkansas is dominating the world of College Football. You guys spend all that Wal-Mart money on your facilities but still got beat by lil Ol Mizzou in football. Hell Ole Miss, TAMU, Arkansas, and South Carolina all have better football stadiums than Mizzou but guess what, Mizzou still beat those teams. So that ARMS RACE talk don't fly.

Mizzou will get recruits. Hell the Chiefs love SEC players and everybody knows that, guess what now Mizzou can use that to it's advantage with 2 pro markets in it's backyard. The best players want to play in the SEC but also want an easier chance at going pro. Jackpot for Mizzou.

And believe me the people of Missouri will not let it's flagship university sag behind, they are planning on upgrading the stadium. By joining the SEC you better believe the people of the Show Me State will step up. Hell the school just spent over $75 mil on a basketball facility, a top notch one. Now it's time for the football upgrades. Hell if Mizzou is doing this good with the facilities they have you better hope they don't do any upgrades because it won't be in Arkansas' best interest considering you already have a hard enough time beating Mizzou even though you have superior facilities.lol.

Talk about BCS bowls, um you guys lost to Ohio State while the other SEC schools that played Ohio State won, good job reppin the SEC with your top notch facilities. Oh and you guys HAVE to upgrade your facilities to get recruits to play in NW ARKANSAS, not a good destination for black recruits if you know what I mean.




Wrong. The last Walton money (walmart) built Bud Walton in 1993. Reynolds Foundation is the one pouring in the money at the moment and has been for the football stadium a new football complex center that broke ground last week.

We got beat by Missouri in 2007 and destroyed them in 2003, what's your point? We've played 5 games against them in over 100 years. The arms race does matter or Tennessee wouldn't spend so much money on recruiting and facilities since they are not in the middle of the deep south like Alabama.

I didn't realize California and Standord can use the pro teams in their backyard.. Oh, wait.. That doesn't matter because they are located in the richest talent state besides Texas and Florida. The state of Missouri puts less players on D-1 roster than Tennessee, Arkansas and possibly Kentucky.

You look stupid referring to all these games Arkansas loses to Missouri.



In the BCS era Arkansas and Missouri is 1-1. We won 1 and lost 1 in typical Nutt Fashion.

LSU has lost to Iowa and Penn State recently in bowl games. You also lost to Ohio State in the regular season in the 80's. Pretty stupid statement in a great BCS game. We played in the BCS Missouri hasn't, period.

Hey, idiot. Fayetteville, Arkansas and Knoxville, Tennessee have the same black population at 6%. While Memphis has 55% and Little Rock has 45%. It's called mountains and cotton doesn't grow well in the mountains for history purposes.

It's pretty easy to understand Missouri will need massive upgrades to compete being so far removed from the talent pool and with little in-state recruiting base. It looks like they are ready for that but we shall see.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram