Started By
Message

re: Who are the largest Winners and Losers In the New SEC?

Posted on 11/8/11 at 9:43 am to
Posted by Amp4LSU
West Monroe
Member since Sep 2006
334 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 9:43 am to
Sunhog, seriously...dude.

Arkansas' facilities/budget SHOULD be larger that Missouri's. Arky has been in the SEC for what, 20 years. If your facilities/budget wasn't better than Mizzou's, there would be something wrong with you guys.



Posted by SunHog
Illinois
Member since Jan 2011
9202 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Sunhog, seriously...dude.

Arkansas' facilities/budget SHOULD be larger that Missouri's. Arky has been in the SEC for what, 20 years. If your facilities/budget wasn't better than Mizzou's, there would be something wrong with you guys.



I disagree.

Missouri has the same population as Tennessee therefore they should not be so far behind Tennessee regardless of SEC money. TV revenue is only 1 aspect of the entire overall budget.

Their football revenue is $25.8M according to the link posted by the Missouri gentlemen. The average SEC football revenue only is $50M. That shows they have a very good basketball revenue and solid donations because there baseball revenue doesn't exist.

Missouri has double the population of Arkansas so honestly they should have a larger budget. However, as direct multiple pro sports in their state which detracts from their money pot.



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram