- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who are the largest Winners and Losers In the New SEC?
Posted on 11/8/11 at 12:30 am to TigerMattSTL
Posted on 11/8/11 at 12:30 am to TigerMattSTL
quote:
Wow, so Arkansas' athletic budget is $123 million a year? If not, Arkansas doesn't double Missouri's.
This is the "manipulation" I was speaking of earlier, or more appropriately, "smoke and mirrors"
Unfortunately for him athletic budgets and superior facilities are not always a barometer of success when comparing two programs.
Over the last 5 years the Mizzou and Arkansas FB teams are very similar. I would argue that the Mizzou BB program was much better.
There has been nothing proven with athletic budgets and "size" of facilities.
The thing I find even more humorous is that evidently Mizzou has had similar success as Arkansas over the last 5 years with a lower athletic budget, inferior facilities and a recruiting disadvantage.
I think highly of UA. I just dont like the blanket statements like this guy has been making.
To the rest of UA fans, you have a great program and I look forward to seeing Mizzou play Arkansas.
2
Posted on 11/8/11 at 12:37 am to kilo
quote:
This is the "manipulation" I was speaking of earlier, or more appropriately, "smoke and mirrors"
Unfortunately for him athletic budgets and superior facilities are not always a barometer of success when comparing two programs.
Over the last 5 years the Mizzou and Arkansas FB teams are very similar. I would argue that the Mizzou BB program was much better.
There has been nothing proven with athletic budgets and "size" of facilities.
The thing I find even more humorous is that evidently Mizzou has had similar success as Arkansas over the last 5 years with a lower athletic budget, inferior facilities and a recruiting disadvantage.
I think highly of UA. I just dont like the blanket statements like this guy has been making.
To the rest of UA fans, you have a great program and I look forward to seeing Mizzou play Arkansas.
I already proved Arkansas has a much bigger Athletic Budget. Click on the link.
I'll show you once again.
Mississippi makes more in football revenue than you, ha.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 12:42 am to kilo
vs
Y'all have a long way to go to get up to SEC football standards in facilities.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News