Started By
Message

re: ESPN and the destruction of their product

Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:05 am to
Posted by cornstarch
Member since May 2010
2226 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:05 am to
I read this article before I saw this thread, could not agree more.

Gene Woeheshkooeski strikes me as a very un-knowledgable, aroused-only-by-50 point-games type of fan. Certainly no expert.

And I truly believe everyone is crediting this as an Alabama loss rather than an LSU win. Do people really expect a college kicker to make 50 and 45 yard field goals? That's what a great defense does. Stop the offense from moving the ball when they need to. Everytime Bama got to the 30-35, we put a clamp on them and forced an extremely long field goal.

frick this spin shite. I know I shouldn't care, but I truly hate people who don't know what the frick they talk about. And these nerds gets PAID for this! hhahahahahahahahaha
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424713 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Do people really expect a college kicker to make 50 and 45 yard field goals?

do people really expect an offense to throw for 100 yards when they throw 17 times?
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24466 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:09 am to
quote:

And I truly believe everyone is crediting this as an Alabama loss rather than an LSU win


then you're clearly just seeing what you want to so you can feel aggrieved.

Most everything I've read has gotten it right. LSU's elite defense won it, but Bama left points out there with crappy special teams. You cannot disagree with any of that. That isn't playing down LSU's win, that's just stating the facts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram