- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More Big 12 GOLD
Posted on 10/27/11 at 11:36 pm to StrickAggie06
Posted on 10/27/11 at 11:36 pm to StrickAggie06
My claim was that A&M has never voted for equal revenue sharing of first- and second-tier revenues, and that point still stands.
1
Posted on 10/28/11 at 12:00 am to texashorn
Actually, your claim was...
...and I showed that this wasn't the case. We voted for the policy to share Tier2 rights equally and to increase Tier1 equal sharing from 57% to 76%. It's not our fault that particular vote didn't extend to full Tier1 rights as well. Feel free to ask Dan Beebe and your own administration why this wasn't the case.
Your attempt to infer that A&M is anti-equal revenue sharing because we refused to vote for granting media rights to the conference is asinine, especially since no conference in college football currently does this for Tier1/Tier2 rights. So until you can produce some sort of evidence that we voted against equal revenue sharing WITHOUT IT BEING CONTINGENT on granting our Tier1/Tier2 media rights, your point does not stand.
quote:
Of course, A&M continually voted for unequal revenue sharing, too
...and I showed that this wasn't the case. We voted for the policy to share Tier2 rights equally and to increase Tier1 equal sharing from 57% to 76%. It's not our fault that particular vote didn't extend to full Tier1 rights as well. Feel free to ask Dan Beebe and your own administration why this wasn't the case.
Your attempt to infer that A&M is anti-equal revenue sharing because we refused to vote for granting media rights to the conference is asinine, especially since no conference in college football currently does this for Tier1/Tier2 rights. So until you can produce some sort of evidence that we voted against equal revenue sharing WITHOUT IT BEING CONTINGENT on granting our Tier1/Tier2 media rights, your point does not stand.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News