Serious Lack of Balance

quote:

---

he B12 and P12 really need to merge. And they still Woukd be weaker than the SEC and B1G who are obviously the strongest conferences

---

Not according the pollsters and computers. The Big 12 is behind the BIG to keyboard heroes only.

This is the dumbest post I have seen on this website...

quote:

---

Name programs by conference

SEC - Bama, LSU, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, Tennessee (A&M and Arkansas on precipice)

B1G - Nebraska, Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State (Wisconsin not far off)

Pac-12 - Is it just USC? (Colorado, Oregon best of rest?)

Big 12 - Texas & OU

ACC - Miami, FSU (VT, UNC are in that just behind category)

---

For you to include Tennessee then you have to include Virginia Tech.

You can also go ahead and add Arkansas...A&M is on the precipice of irrelevance (One top 25 finish in the past 10 years...last top ten finish in 94?)

For you to include Penn State and not Wisconsin ruins your whole argument.

Count Oregon...to even consider Colorado as "best of the rest" without mentioning Stanford is worse than your Wisconsin snub.

I am officially done with this website.

Depending on what you mean by name, I think of it in terms of forward-looking national title relevance. I'd say it's more like the following:


SEC - LSU, Bama, Florida (Auburn, Georgia, and Tennessee on precipice)

B1G - Michigan, Ohio State (Nebraska maybe...someday, I guess)

Pac-12 - It is just USC (Oregon best of rest)

Big 12 - Texas & OU (Ok St, kind of, but not really)

ACC - (FSU, VT in that just behind category)

Every other conference - lol

If you mean just recognizable brand, then shoot go with Notre Dame, too. But we all know their football program is curled up into a ball behind a rest stop toilet somewhere.