- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Auburn wants to leave West & Bama doesnt want Mizzou
Posted on 10/6/11 at 7:59 am
Posted on 10/6/11 at 7:59 am
On phone so cant link. SEC has majority of presidents voting for Mizzou, but not yet the 9 needed.
Bama wants to wait for a better team & prefers that team come from East and play in East. AU in favor of Mizzou coming and AU moving to East. Also, Bama is concerned it wouldnt be able to play Tennessee annually.
Bama wants to wait for a better team & prefers that team come from East and play in East. AU in favor of Mizzou coming and AU moving to East. Also, Bama is concerned it wouldnt be able to play Tennessee annually.
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 8:00 am
18
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:01 am to bamasgot13
quote:
CEB
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:01 am to bamasgot13
quote:
Bama wants to wait for a better team
There isn't a better team out there for us.
V-Tech is coming when we go to 16 but not before.
quote:
Bama is concerned it wouldnt be able to play Tennessee annually.
Eventually this will happen regardless. When we go to 16 in a few years, they aren't putting Bama, Auburn and Tennessee all in the same pod.
Alabama really needs to let this Tennessee shite go. It's just not feasible with the scheduling realities that are coming.
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 8:04 am
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:03 am to bamasgot13
I guess Auburn is scared of Bama?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:03 am to bamasgot13
Mizz will replace Tenn as your tradional rivals...deal with it. 
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:03 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Eventually this will happen regardless.
This^^, I wonder who the other 2 or so teams that voted no, assumming that UT voted no as well.
quote:
V-Tech is coming when we go to 16 but not before.
I dont know, the ACC put in some new wording and higher buyout to leave the conference
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:04 am to LsuTool
quote:
I guess Auburn is scared of Bama
No, our natural place is in the east with Bama as our cross div. rival
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:04 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
I dont know, the ACC put in some new wording and higher buyout to leave the conference
Even if you're right, that just means we need Missouri even more
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:05 am to LsuTool
Despite the whining that would ensue from Bama fans, it would be Aub/Bama as cross-divisionals and we'd pick up Florida, Tennessee & USC.
We'd lose LSU which is a bummer given how great those games have been in the recent past.
But those are some great pickups for Auburn in exchange for the MS schools and Arkansas.
We'd lose LSU which is a bummer given how great those games have been in the recent past.
But those are some great pickups for Auburn in exchange for the MS schools and Arkansas.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:06 am to bamasgot13
After all the talking heads saying it would be Florida, Georgia, or South Carolina blocking a new member, it ends up being Alabama.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:06 am to Draconian Sanctions
wonder who the other three schools blocking it are?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:06 am to KajunGator
Bama to the EAST
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:06 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Alabama really needs to let this Tennessee shite go. It's just not feasible with the scheduling realities that are coming.
I can see something like this being said by an LSU fan, who has no real rival. You don't just "let go" of your all-time historical rival. That was a stupid thing to say.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:07 am to PuntBamaPunt
quote:
wonder who the other three schools blocking it are?
Guessing one is at least UT
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:07 am to bamasgot13
quote:
Bama is concerned it wouldnt be able to play Tennessee annually.
Simple solution - move both Bama and Auburn to the east and Vandy to the west.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:10 am to blueridgeTiger
Yeah, LSU would love that, wouldn't they?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:10 am to BamaInHsv
LINK
Two sources familiar with the SEC's discussions about Missouri told The Birmingham News Wednesday that as of now it appears that a majority of SEC presidents and chancellors would support Missouri's application. But the sources said that majority falls just short of the nine votes required to add a new member.
My read is they are at 8 with UT and Bama voting no... Not sure who the other two are, but my guess would be Eastern Teams, so USCe and Florida voting no.
Two sources familiar with the SEC's discussions about Missouri told The Birmingham News Wednesday that as of now it appears that a majority of SEC presidents and chancellors would support Missouri's application. But the sources said that majority falls just short of the nine votes required to add a new member.
My read is they are at 8 with UT and Bama voting no... Not sure who the other two are, but my guess would be Eastern Teams, so USCe and Florida voting no.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:11 am to blueridgeTiger
Actually, I agree with Bama.the team should be from the east and should be FSU.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:12 am to blueridgeTiger
quote:
Simple solution - move both Bama and Auburn to the east and Vandy to the west.
Sure, LSU on one side and Alabama,Auburn,Florida,
Georgia,Tennessee on the other.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 8:12 am to allin2010
quote:
but my guess would be Eastern Teams, so USCe and Florida voting no.
Why would you not guess that it's at least one of the other Tigers? I don't see any reason why USC or UF would have an issue.
Page 1 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News