- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:14 pm to Chicken
Chicken... President and CEO of Team Swag
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:14 pm to 32tors88
I think it is JL spot to loose we just added a senior qb mid season alot of teams would love to be 4-0 going into the stretch and add a senior qb that knows the system.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:15 pm to 32tors88
Exactly!!! I can see fewer and fewer FGs and more TDs in the redzone with the JJ package Plus not JLee can take a few more chances on the ground now and show off his wheels if he likes. Its a win win for everyone... not other SEC teams
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:15 pm to Chicken
JJ is part of this team and a Tiger.
WTF is wrong with some of these people?
WTF is wrong with some of these people?
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:15 pm to Chicken
For what it is worth, I think JJ will be great depth to our QB position. I'm glad JL is the starting QB because he has been doing well and has the team on a roll.
That being said, I'm not really sure that I'm a fan of the censorship. I agree that some stuff is a little much, in which it is necessary to remove. But I don't think removing all things negative about JJ is a good thing. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I'm a great fan of this site and how you run it. Just don't agree with this.
ETA: I see now where in the first paragraph you say you will remove comments that cross the line. Second one says keep negative comments to yourself. Somewhat misread at first.
That being said, I'm not really sure that I'm a fan of the censorship. I agree that some stuff is a little much, in which it is necessary to remove. But I don't think removing all things negative about JJ is a good thing. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I'm a great fan of this site and how you run it. Just don't agree with this.
ETA: I see now where in the first paragraph you say you will remove comments that cross the line. Second one says keep negative comments to yourself. Somewhat misread at first.
This post was edited on 9/28/11 at 9:19 pm
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:16 pm to tiger1014
Are you really this ignorant???? Wow!
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:16 pm to TIGEREYE1
I think some negative comments, as long as they aren't personal attacks can be allowed. This is a debate forum. Don't ruin the integrity of the board.
This post was edited on 9/28/11 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:16 pm to lsuhunt555
Yes! The rant is in full blown meltdown tonight!
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:19 pm to Chicken
May I talk badly about Thomas Jefferson or Richard Jefferson?
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:20 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
What about George; George??
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:21 pm to 1999
Present
This post was edited on 9/28/11 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:21 pm to Chicken
So we can only post our opinions if you agree with them? What bullshite.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:22 pm to SpicyStacy
Agree. No sense in bad mouthing any Tiger.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:22 pm to Chicken
Fwiw I said this over 2 hrs ago and an admin told me that nothing was said. What r u talking about was his exact words.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 9:24 pm to Chicken
You da man, Chicken. It's unreal how many chicken littles there are on this board (no pun intended).
The positives of JJ returning faaaaaaaar outweigh the negatives.
The positives of JJ returning faaaaaaaar outweigh the negatives.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News