- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

What about a new SEC 16 with four divisions.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 9:54 am
Posted on 9/21/11 at 9:54 am
What about a new SEC 16 with four divisions.
SEC 16 West: LSU, Texas A&M, Miss State and Ole Miss
SEC 16 North: Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Missouri and Arkansas
SEC 16 South: Alabama, Tennessee, Vandy and Kentucky
SEC 16 East: Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and Auburn (since it wants to join the East so bad)
9 conference games, 3 with division members each year, and rotating 2 games from each other division.
Rotate SEC 16 Football Conference Championship game: New Orleans (Superdome), Dallas (Jerry’s World) and Atlanta Dome.
Two teams with best conference records in championship game.
SEC 16 West: LSU, Texas A&M, Miss State and Ole Miss
SEC 16 North: Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Missouri and Arkansas
SEC 16 South: Alabama, Tennessee, Vandy and Kentucky
SEC 16 East: Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and Auburn (since it wants to join the East so bad)
9 conference games, 3 with division members each year, and rotating 2 games from each other division.
Rotate SEC 16 Football Conference Championship game: New Orleans (Superdome), Dallas (Jerry’s World) and Atlanta Dome.
Two teams with best conference records in championship game.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 9:55 am to klingsville tiger
quote:Do you really want LSU to be forever stuck with these other three teams? I'd be less unhappy with this if one of the Mississippis and Arkansas traded spots. But not happy, mind you. Not happy.
SEC 16 West: LSU, Texas A&M, Miss State and Ole Miss
This post was edited on 9/21/11 at 9:57 am
Posted on 9/21/11 at 9:57 am to klingsville tiger
I would kill myself.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 9:57 am to klingsville tiger
I like it except...
at this point...that's three gimme wins for Bama. not cool.
quote:
SEC 16 South: Alabama, Tennessee, Vandy and Kentucky
at this point...that's three gimme wins for Bama. not cool.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 9:58 am to klingsville tiger
Like your thought process, but I'll pass on that idea.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 10:00 am to klingsville tiger
quote:
9 conference games
that is brutal if there's not playoff format. And how are you going to crown a champion? Play semifinal games AND a championship game? Then you're champion has played 11 SEC teams. THEN, they've got to go beat somebody else for the NC? frick that.
quote:
Rotate SEC 16 Football Conference Championship game: New Orleans (Superdome), Dallas (Jerry’s World) and Atlanta Dome.
Why rotate? I don't like the Superdome being considered anyway. The Sugar Bowl is in New Orleans and possibly the NCCG--nobody wants to go there twice. I understand LSU fans wanting the advantage of having it in New Orleans occassionaly, but that's not a good enough reason for me. Rotate it between Dallas and Atlanta if you have to, but I'd be fine with having it in Dallas permanently. Not sure the City of Atlanta would be too thrilled with that, though.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 10:00 am to klingsville tiger
quote:
SEC 16 East: Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and Auburn (since it wants to join the East so bad)
Would be sick. Each of the other three would be dominated by one team, but this would be anybody's for the taking year in, year out. And I've got mixed feelings about that.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 10:00 am to klingsville tiger
Who says Auburn wants to join the East? I think its a matter of if needed, we'll do it.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 10:01 am to klingsville tiger
quote:
SEC 16 West: LSU, Texas A&M, Miss State and Ole Miss
Posted on 9/21/11 at 10:59 am to RummelTiger
Would it be impossible to play a doubleheader for possible semi-finals games? Have one kickoff at noon and the other kickoff at 7 or 8. It would be cool to have 4 SEC teams in the same city with their fans.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 11:44 am to klingsville tiger
quote:
9 conference games
i think that if conferences increase membership to 16, then number of conference games will have to increase beyond 9 games, maybe even to the realm of 11 or 12, which would increase the overall number of games in the season, unless teams were to play conference games exclusively. This is an aspect that seems to be overlooked, or is at least not being discussed, in all this fantasy drafting of teams to conferences.
If the season were to extend to 14-15 reg season games, AND add conf championship games, AND add playoff/bowl games to the end of the season, you are looking at teams potentially playing 16-18 games in a season. just dont see it happening.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 12:43 pm to 9th life
With these 16 teams, I go:
Pod 1 (preserves OU/OSU and Arkansas/A&M have SWC history)
OU
OSU
Arkansas
A&M
Pod 2 (preserves the Egg Bowl and LSU/Ole Miss. Mizzou is an outlier in any plan with these teams)
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss State
Mizzou
Pod 3 (wouldn't it be funny so see TN prevent Spurrier from winning this pod?)
Kentucky
Vandy
Tennessee
S Carolina
Pod 4 (Preserves the Iron Bowl and Cocktail Party)
Georgia
Florida
Auburn
Bama
You play every team in your pod every year and two of the four teams in each of the other pods. This was the scheduling idea that I kept hearing for a Pac 16.
The real question would be how to determine the top two teams for the championship game.
Pod 1 (preserves OU/OSU and Arkansas/A&M have SWC history)
OU
OSU
Arkansas
A&M
Pod 2 (preserves the Egg Bowl and LSU/Ole Miss. Mizzou is an outlier in any plan with these teams)
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss State
Mizzou
Pod 3 (wouldn't it be funny so see TN prevent Spurrier from winning this pod?)
Kentucky
Vandy
Tennessee
S Carolina
Pod 4 (Preserves the Iron Bowl and Cocktail Party)
Georgia
Florida
Auburn
Bama
You play every team in your pod every year and two of the four teams in each of the other pods. This was the scheduling idea that I kept hearing for a Pac 16.
The real question would be how to determine the top two teams for the championship game.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 12:45 pm to klingsville tiger
I would swap Arkansas and TAMU... You might as well keep all the newcomers in the same division.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 12:50 pm to daboman of Aggieland
1 - OU, OSU, MO, Arky
2 - LSU, Ole Miss, MSU, A&M
3 - AL, AU, TN, Vandy
4 - FL, GA, SC, KT
This would seem more fair in regards to rivalries and competition.
2 - LSU, Ole Miss, MSU, A&M
3 - AL, AU, TN, Vandy
4 - FL, GA, SC, KT
This would seem more fair in regards to rivalries and competition.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 12:57 pm to Dice
I've got to agree, Dice. Having Vandy and Kentucky in the same pod was a bit unfair (i.e. too easy for SC and TN).
Posted on 9/21/11 at 1:02 pm to klingsville tiger
quote:
SEC 16 East: Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and Auburn (since it wants to join the East so bad)
To much traditional power in one division. Not going to happen.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 1:18 pm to daboman of Aggieland
quote:Probably totally moot, but no to Mizzou in this already duller than dull pod. Let them go to your Pod 1 newbies, and put A&M in Pod 2 with LSU and the Mississippis.
Pod 2 (preserves the Egg Bowl and LSU/Ole Miss. Mizzou is an outlier in any plan with these teams)
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss State
Mizzou
Posted on 9/21/11 at 1:19 pm to daboman of Aggieland
quote:
You play every team in your pod every year and two of the four teams in each of the other pods. This was the scheduling idea that I kept hearing for a Pac 16.
and yet the PAC-12 decided not to expand. it just doesnt seem realistic to either play that many more games, or to have a confernce champion that only plays 60% of the teams in conference.
on a tangent, why would ESPN et al, pay more money for essentially the same product they have now? Adding more teams to the conference alone wouldnt be a reason to renegotiate, but adding more games to the schedule would.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 1:43 pm to daboman of Aggieland
The SEC is a little complicated because they will probably have to keep one fixed opponent from other divisions. But let's say you have the following divisions:
1 OU, OkS, Arky, MU
2 LSU, A&M, Ole Miss, MSU
3 Alabama, Auburn, UT, Vandy
4 Fla, UGA, USC, KY
With the following fixed opponents:
OU/Bama
Auburn/UGA
Florida/UT
LSU/Missouri
Arky/A&M
Ok State/USC
Ole Miss/Vandy
MSU/KY
These would generally do a good job of matching up similar quality programs from the different divisions (important to even out the schedule). Yes, LSU>MU but I thought the A&M/Arky history was more valuable than LSU/Arky so that's how it worked out
And for scheduling in general you would probably end up having to do some kind of layered schedule (I just proposed something similar for the PAC but here's how it might work for the SEC). First you make a list of every school in the conference:
1) Alabama
2) Ole Miss
3) Arky
4) A&M
5) Florida
6) Vandy
7) OU
8) South Carolina
9) Auburn
10) MSU
11) LSU
12) Missouri
13) UGA
14) KY
15) Ok State
16) Tennessee
then you set aside your 3 division games and one fixed opponent and rotate the four games among the remaining schools.
For Alabama this would mean (you play Auburn, OU, Tennessee, and Vandy every year with) a rotation of something like this in years 1&2:
Ole Miss
Arky
A&M
Florida
In years 3&4:
South Carolina
MSU
LSU
Missouri
In years 5&6:
UGA
KY
Ok State
Ole Miss
1 OU, OkS, Arky, MU
2 LSU, A&M, Ole Miss, MSU
3 Alabama, Auburn, UT, Vandy
4 Fla, UGA, USC, KY
With the following fixed opponents:
OU/Bama
Auburn/UGA
Florida/UT
LSU/Missouri
Arky/A&M
Ok State/USC
Ole Miss/Vandy
MSU/KY
These would generally do a good job of matching up similar quality programs from the different divisions (important to even out the schedule). Yes, LSU>MU but I thought the A&M/Arky history was more valuable than LSU/Arky so that's how it worked out
And for scheduling in general you would probably end up having to do some kind of layered schedule (I just proposed something similar for the PAC but here's how it might work for the SEC). First you make a list of every school in the conference:
1) Alabama
2) Ole Miss
3) Arky
4) A&M
5) Florida
6) Vandy
7) OU
8) South Carolina
9) Auburn
10) MSU
11) LSU
12) Missouri
13) UGA
14) KY
15) Ok State
16) Tennessee
then you set aside your 3 division games and one fixed opponent and rotate the four games among the remaining schools.
For Alabama this would mean (you play Auburn, OU, Tennessee, and Vandy every year with) a rotation of something like this in years 1&2:
Ole Miss
Arky
A&M
Florida
In years 3&4:
South Carolina
MSU
LSU
Missouri
In years 5&6:
UGA
KY
Ok State
Ole Miss
Posted on 9/21/11 at 2:05 pm to klingsville tiger
Horrible first post.
Popular
Back to top

12





