- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Grand jury to hear LSU football players case Wednesday; DNA inconclusive
Posted on 9/19/11 at 9:23 pm to Stevo
Posted on 9/19/11 at 9:23 pm to Stevo
I'm not going back through this thread, so has this question been answered?
Taking this into consideration:
Someone tell me how no matches to victims = inconclusive? Would it not just be negative for a match?
Taking this into consideration:
quote:
Results of DNA taken from suspended quarterback Jordan Jefferson and suspended linebacker Joshua Johns are inconclusive, Moore added. There were no matches to the victims, he said.
Someone tell me how no matches to victims = inconclusive? Would it not just be negative for a match?
1
Posted on 9/19/11 at 9:47 pm to RummelTiger
quote:maybe the victims kicked each other...
Someone tell me how no matches to victims = inconclusive? Would it not just be negative for a match?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News