re: JJ update WDSU

I think the attorney's argument is exactly correct. I sense the physical "evidence" is flimsy at best and likely non-existent and hence the investigation is totally dependent on testimony of questionable 'witnesses'.

Otherwise, the DA would make the charge.

Considering the nature of the alleged "crime" and its level of seriousness (a bar fight for goodness sake), all of this is a terrible waste of taxpayer resources and may end up being an horrible injustice to Jefferson personally.

The attorney is correct is affirming that no court action can rectify the damage done to JJ should it eventually not prove worthy of a trial.