- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lee vs. Mett - Question based on assumptions
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:57 pm to Uncommon Cents
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:57 pm to Uncommon Cents
But under this theory, Mett would not be the starter next year. Next year, we will have a different QB with two years of eligibility left, so he will get the start. Right?
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:00 pm to Sammy Joe
quote:
Sammy Joe
quote:
But under this theory...Next year, we will have a different QB with two years of eligibility left, so he will get the start. Right?
yes, assuming those same things. maybe my point is this: i believe the lee playbook and the mett playbook are virtually identical at this point, and i think it's not insane to think that, if they were both allowed to play our schedule, their stats at the end of this year would be very similar.
if you think that will apply next year to mett vs. rivers or mett vs. whoever, then yes, you start the younger player.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News