Started By
Message

re: Lee vs. Mett - Question based on assumptions

Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:57 pm to
Posted by Sammy Joe
Dallas
Member since Jul 2008
62 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:57 pm to
But under this theory, Mett would not be the starter next year. Next year, we will have a different QB with two years of eligibility left, so he will get the start. Right?
Posted by TexasTiger82
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2011
48 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Sammy Joe


quote:

But under this theory...Next year, we will have a different QB with two years of eligibility left, so he will get the start. Right?


yes, assuming those same things. maybe my point is this: i believe the lee playbook and the mett playbook are virtually identical at this point, and i think it's not insane to think that, if they were both allowed to play our schedule, their stats at the end of this year would be very similar.

if you think that will apply next year to mett vs. rivers or mett vs. whoever, then yes, you start the younger player.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram