Started By
Message
locked post

I am surprised no one has thought about this...

Posted on 9/10/11 at 12:06 am
Posted by The Third
Temple, Texas
Member since Jan 2010
145 posts
Posted on 9/10/11 at 12:06 am
So let's all agree that the Big 12 is soon to be history. We know that A & M is gone and there is a very strong probability that Oklahoma and OSU will announce they are leaving to join the PAC ?. There is also a good probability the UT and Tuberville's TTU will join Oklahoma and OSU. There is no way that the remaining five teams could salvage the conference and even if they added UTEP, UH, Texas State, Rice and SMU, the conference would no longer be able to keep the BCS Automatic Qualifier Status. Are we so naive to believe that the BCS AQ currently held by the Big 12 would not go out West to Larry Scott's new Pacific West Conference? The new 16 member conference would have not one, but two BCS AQs and would be able to send as many as four teams to BCS bowls each year. This would be a huge advantage to that conference. An advantage that would be damaging to the dominance of the SEC.

Baylor should "stand down" in it's efforts to preserve a doomed conference and "Rise Up" and look to persuade Kansas and Kansas State to join with them into the Mountain West Conference and take the BCS AQ with them before Deloss Dodd & his minions steals it away.
This post was edited on 9/10/11 at 12:08 am
Posted by Wolf Shirt
the boardwalk
Member since Sep 2008
10613 posts
Posted on 9/10/11 at 12:14 am to
Are you saying pac gets two? Dumb
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 9/10/11 at 12:17 am to
Interesting thought. While I hate the arrogant cocksuckers in Austin, methinks the AQ goes with them or OU no matter what. Those three schools probably don't have the clout to haul the AQ with them and away from a big 12 with OU and t.u.
Posted by mre
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2009
3090 posts
Posted on 9/10/11 at 7:12 am to
The SEC, Big Ten, ACC, and Big East would never agree with the PAC16 receiving four BCS bids, so I do not think this is a realistic possibility.
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4058 posts
Posted on 9/10/11 at 7:41 am to
quote:

The new 16 member conference would have not one, but two BCS AQs and would be able to send as many as four teams to BCS bowls each year.

I don't feel like getting into it, but this ain't happening. Might get up to a third bid when the contract comes up, but that's it. FWIW, in terms of PAYOUT, the SEC and B1G pretty much have the equivalent of 3 with the Capital Oone Bowl. The 2nd BCS team from a conf gets about 4.5M and the Capital One pays 4+.
This post was edited on 9/10/11 at 7:51 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram